Buy Term and Invest the Rest - Where is the Value?

This has been a much debated topic in the financial planning arena since don't know when. As a student and practitioner of financial planning, I am challenged to constantly find a balance in the way I build my convictions on such financial matters. Times change, and with it many variables and components.

A whole life insurance plan that was touted by agents to offer 6-7% returns p.a. no longer holds true. We have to live with the reality that a participating plan (such as a whole life policy) now offers a dismal return of just over 3% - and that's is NOT even guaranteed okay!

Insurance companies are finding it harder to offer higher bonuses and dividends over the last 10 years. Yields have come off drastically. Inflation, on the other hand, is pushing vigilently upward. Things are getting more expensive, with little or no sign of abating. Your savings in the bank is strinking. "Eroding" in value is a better word, technically.

It is against this new or pressing backdrops that I re-evaluated my positions on "Buy Term and Invest the Rest" (BTITR). You see, life is limited, so are its resources. I am talking about income. In financial planning matters, the concept of "income" takes centre stage to and for me. Without income, you are out. Period. Income, income, income. Personal income. Generated by yourself by your hands and with your time. Pocket money from parents, grand-parents and god-parents don't count - we are adults already!

Just this morning during my usual routine run and breakfast with my esteemed associate, Wayne Koh, we talked about the topic on BTITR. We both agree that in current environment, BTITR seems to offer more appeal. Rather than leaving your money totally to the insurance companies, you deconstruct your portfolio allocation and reconstruct your own strategies and approach.

What is BTITR?

Simply, it is separating protection from participation. It is investment without involvement. It is leaving protection to the insurance specialist and investment to the professional fund managers. Let me explain in simple terms.

Protection without participation
When you buy a whole life plan, the plans are usually called "participating policies" - they participate in the returns of the life funds. Life funds is the place where insurance companies invest what is remain from the premiums collected, after commissions and overheads. They invest the funds in a broad range of diversified assets, and then declared a return to policyholders each year. Claims are made out from the life funds too, and hence the funds are not supposed to be subjected to risky investments for fear of high volatility and threats of inability to meet future claims.

When you buy term, the plans are usually called "non-participating policies" - they DO NOT participate in the returns of the life funds. You pay for protection only. Period. No returns. No strings attached. You choose how much and how long you need the coverage. Then the only liability on your part is paying the premium. It is cheap, dirt cheap. When I was a tied agent many years ago, my manager called it "Poor man insurance". Even the poor can afford it.

I call it "Wise man insurance" - Only the wise will purchase it. Buy it for its worth and value. Let me explain later.

Investment without involvement
Now, since term insurance is cheaper, way cheaper, there will be excess cash appeared from "unused" or "un-expensed" premium. Truth is, for the same amount of sum assured, say $300,000, you pay $1,800 p.a., compared to a whole life plan, which cost around $8,700. I am using a 35 year-old male, non-smoker. That's a whopping $6,900 difference. Now, what do you or can you do with this difference call "the rest"? Invest it, of course.

In this manner, you start to explore ways to park this excess cashflow. You terminate your cashflow's involvement with the insurance company's life funds and her fate or rate of returns. Haha...fate of returns, what an appropriate slip of tongue. Therefore, it is considered investment without involvement. Hence, BTITR.

Is it true? Yes!
Is it better? Depends!!

It depends on what you DO with the rest of the unused money. If invested carefully, you will outperform the life funds, with the flexibility of choosing your own portfolio of assets and not to mention the benefits of not needing to stick around with a whole life policy for at least 20-25 years before the cash value becomes visible and mature enough for withdrawal.

Yes, it is true and it can be better.

For those who need to see discreet numbers, please refer to my buddy and esteemed associate, Wayne Koh, and his notes in his blog - http://www.waynekoh.com/2008/07/btitr.html

More ideas later, okay. You must wait if you want good stuff. I don't get paid for writing, okay! Just kidding :)

Coming up next - Recommended Allocation for BTITR.